Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Modern Research and Education‖ (May 2-4, 2026) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – Warsaw, Poland, 2026. - 523 p.

32 of "financial system stability" indicates only one thing - the absence of a unanimous, clear definition of this term. This proves, on the one hand, the complexity, and on the other - the multi-vector nature of the concept, which makes it impossible to provide clarity in its definition and search for effective evaluation indicators. This state of affairs is observed not only among domestic, but also foreign scientists. Thus, foreign scientists pay considerable attention to the assessment and definition of the concept of "financial system stability". M. Foote defines the stability of the financial system by indicators: a) monetary stability; b) the level of employment of the population close to the normal employment rate in the economy; c) the confidence of economic entities in financial markets and institutions; d) the absence of significant fluctuations in prices for real or financial assets [1]. It is worth recognizing that the theoretical and methodological justifications and practical developments of foreign scientists are designed primarily for countries with a developed economy and an appropriate management system and, unfortunately, do not fully meet the conditions for the development of the Ukrainian economy, since they do not take into account certain national peculiarities that exist. At the same time, the merits of foreign scientists lie in the fact that they reveal the main theoretical provisions that undoubtedly enrich economic science, however, and this is right, they are designed for the development model of their countries. In our opinion, research and development of appropriate methodological tools for definition and assessment requires a systematic approach to considering all components of the domestic financial system. Establishing their interaction within the integrity of the mechanism, as well as responding to external factors of influence, generated, including, by the processes of modern globalization and its associated consequences. Of course, the financial system of a country with its specific features requires constant revision of approaches to its assessment, since it is dynamic, constantly in motion, developing and improving. The results of its objective assessment, providing it with an appropriate rating among other financial systems is important information