Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―Cambridge Science and Education Conference‖ (May 15-17, 2026) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. - Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2026. - 429 p.

97 Relatively Low Flight Velocity: GABs typically maintain lower velocities compared to cruise or ballistic missiles. This extended flight time increases the reaction window for early warning systems and air defense units to engage the threat. Requirement for High-Fidelity Intelligence: The effective employment of GABs necessitates real-time, high-precision target coordinates. Intelligence failures, rapid maneuver of ground forces, or the tactical deployment of decoys (false targets) can drastically reduce the overall strike effectiveness. Primary Methods for Countering GABs Reinforcement of Air Defense Systems The most effective method of counteraction is the destruction of carrier aircraft prior to the point of munition release. This requires the employment of modern long- range and medium-range air defense systems. These assets facilitate airspace control and compel enemy aviation to operate at greater, safer standoff distances. A pivotal role is played by a multi-layered air defense system, which includes: • Long-range missile complexes; • Mobile anti-aircraft gun systems; • Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS); • Automated target detection and tracking systems. The integration of diverse armament types increases the probability of intercepting both the carrier aircrafts and the munitions themselves. Electronic Warfare The majority of modern GABs rely on satellite navigation. Electronic warfare (EW) is capable of generating interference against navigation signals, which either degrades strike precision or completely diverts the munition from its intended flight path. EW systems are utilized to: • Jam GPS or GLONASS signals; • Generating false coordinates; • Disrupt communication links within the guidance system architecture.