Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference ―New York Global Science Conference 2026‖ (May 18-20, 2026) / Publisher website: www.naukainfo.com. – New York, USA, 2026. - 322 p.

42 transformation of scientists' views in other areas of social knowledge, up to a change in the paradigm of scientific thinking. The issues of the functioning of the economy under conditions of uncertainty are considered in the works of leading world scientists. For example, in the collective work "Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty. From Theory to Practice" [1], it is noted that government decision-makers, as well as the analysts and experts they rely on, must have a sound basis to shape decisions that anticipate future economic, technological and social transformations, taking into account the interests of society and other stakeholders. This work explores approaches and tools that support the development of strategic plans under conditions of deep uncertainty and their testing in the real world, including barriers and factors that facilitate their use in practice. Policymaking under uncertainty, complexity, and change is discussed in Michael Heasle's book "Uncertainty in Policy Making: Values and Evidence in Complex Decisions" [2]. Michael Heasle has examined how uncertainty is interpreted and used by politicians and experts. The author argues that the traditional notions of rational, evidence-based policymaking, which governments and organizations around the world proclaim as the only way to make good policy, are an impossible goal in highly complex and uncertain environments. That is, the blind pursuit of such a ―rational‖ goal is actually irrational in a world of competing values and interests. Michael Heasle’s work is built on two high-profile and important case studies: the Iraq War and climate change policy in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Among domestic scientists, for example, in the works of Zhalilo Ya.A. it is emphasized that modern uncertainty is not only a consequence of exogenous influences, but also has the character of endogenous institutional uncertainty. The latter, in the author's opinion, characterizes the state of the social system in which endogenous processes and exogenous influences on the system do not have complementary institutional norms, which leads to unpredictability and limited rationality of the response to them of economic entities and, as a result, increases the uncertainty of the conditions of their interaction within the system [3, p.6].